top of page

SAAF AI Connector Acceptance Package

  • Sep 19, 2025
  • 3 min read

Purpose: Evaluate and document the security, privacy, and compliance readiness of AI connectors before production use—ensuring responsible integration with enterprise systems and sensitive data.


Why Use This?

AI connectors enable powerful automation and search capabilities—but they also introduce new risks. This package helps your security team:

  • Understand what data flows through the connector

  • Identify risks to privacy, compliance, and internal controls

  • Mitigate threats like data leakage, bias, phishing, and unauthorized access

  • Ensure safe, scalable, and ethical deployment


Use it for reviewing:

  • AI connectors from platforms like Atlassian, Microsoft, Google, Salesforce, etc.

  • Any app or integration that uses generative AI or large language models (LLMs)

  • Tools that access or exchange sensitive data through APIs or embedded assistants


1. Executive Summary

  • Connector Name & Provider:

  • Business Use Case:

  • Deployment Goal: How this connector supports organizational needs (e.g., improves productivity, enables federated search, etc.)

  • Internal Teams Impacted: (e.g., Legal, Finance, Customer Support)


2. Connector Overview

Field

Description

Connector Function

What it does (e.g., indexes Google Drive, syncs tasks, summarizes tickets)

AI Type

Generative AI, RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation), Predictive AI

Model Type

Proprietary, Open Source, Hosted LLM (e.g., GPT-4, Gemini)

Deployment Model

SaaS, On-premise, Hybrid

Data Flow Summary

High-level explanation of what data is sent/received and by whom


3. Data Privacy and Protection

3.1 Data Handling

  • What types of data are processed (e.g., PII, client records, financials)?

  • Are sensitive fields masked, filtered, or encrypted?

  • Does the connector use data for AI model training?


3.2 Data Residency & GDPR

  • Where is the data processed and stored?

  • Does the vendor support data residency options (e.g., EU, US)?

  • Is the vendor GDPR-compliant?

  • DPA signed? SCCs in place?


3.3 Data Retention & Deletion

  • Can data be deleted upon request (Right to Erasure)?

  • What is the data retention policy?

  • How is temporary cache or session data handled?


4. AI Model and Risk Mitigation

4.1 Model Transparency

  • Is the model explainable or observable?

  • Are there known issues with hallucinations, bias, or misalignment?

  • Can admins restrict which models are used?


4.2 Human-in-the-Loop Controls

  • Are critical outputs (e.g., financial summaries, customer emails) reviewed by a human?

  • How are inaccuracies or inappropriate outputs reported and escalated?


5. Security Architecture

5.1 Authentication and Authorization

  • Supports SSO and MFA?

  • RBAC controls in place?

  • Can permissions be scoped per department or team?


5.2 Encryption

  • End-to-end encryption standards (TLS 1.2+, AES-256)?

  • Are encryption keys managed internally or by vendor?


5.3 Logging & Monitoring

  • Can activity logs be exported to a SIEM?

  • Are audit logs accessible to security teams?

  • Are alerts available for anomalous behavior?


6. Fraud, Phishing, and Misuse

  • Does the connector generate communications (emails, chats)?

  • Could it be used to impersonate internal users?

  • Protections against:

    • Prompt injection?

    • Social engineering?

    • Fake or misleading outputs?

  • Are there escalation protocols for flagged content?


7. Review and Testing Plan

7.1 Access Review

  • Who will use the connector?

  • Is access managed via IT or self-service?

  • Is there a deprovisioning process?


7.2 Testing Environments

  • Was the connector tested in a staging/sandbox environment?

  • Was synthetic or masked data used?

  • Any issues surfaced during testing?


7.3 Risk Rating Summary (Example Table)

Category

Risk Level

Notes / Mitigation Steps

GDPR Compliance

Medium

SCC in place, residency confirmed

Prompt Injection

High

Human review + prompt hardening needed

Phishing / Spoofing Risk

Medium

Connector disabled for chat generation

PII/Data Exposure

Low

Masking and RBAC enforced


8. Required Supporting Documentation

  • Data Flow Diagram

  • Data Processing Agreement (DPA)

  • DPIA (Data Protection Impact Assessment), if applicable

  • AI Risk Audit or Model Behavior Testing Summary

  • Access Control and User Provisioning Plan

  • Logging & Monitoring Overview

  • End User Guidelines / Terms of Use

  • User Training or Prompt Safety Guide

  • Incident Response Plan for AI misuse


Appendix (Optional)

  • Vendor security certifications (e.g., SOC 2, ISO 27001)

  • Internal ethics or bias review

  • Recent penetration test or red team report

  • Change management or rollback procedures

  • Vendor support or security contact

Comments


© Copyright 2026

Helping people and organizations adopt AI

with confidence, responsibility and impact.

bottom of page